Race:
a: any one of the groups that humans are often divided into based on physical traits regarded as common among people of shared ancestry
b: a group of people sharing a common cultural, geographical, linguistic, or religious origin or background
Merriam Webster
Equality Versus Truth
If The Right is accused of anything more than bigotry, it is for being racist. Needless to say, this subject is very dense and there are countless approaches to take. This article is simply an introduction to my own thoughts. I do not include any scientific data or pull sources out of the woodwork. The following is my thoughts and observations. Nothing more.
Equality is the buzz word of the day. This begs the question: what is equality and what limitations are, not acceptable, but essential for a society and – consequently, and arguably more importantly – culture?
There are many issues at play that require digestion. The first requirement, before further argument, is to establish the position this paper proceeds from, and that is of objective reality. It is common to hear people say they are living their “personal truth.” Does this mean, then, that what is true for one is not true for another? If this is the case, then there is no truth at all, for Truth is a constant. Pedophilia is evil and sinful. With regards to objective statements like this, the quality of a thing either is or is not and does not change from one person to another. On this note, all instances of life are objective. There is a correct answer to every question in its own context. There are, undoubtedly, differing opinions, but from this fact alone it is clear that only one can be correct. For how can all perspectives be true at once? They cannot.
This brings us to the second point: that of social acceptance versus universal truth. Pedophilia, despite being acceptable – if not a common practice – in different cultures and areas in the world is an objective moral evil. Foreign traditions do not change this fact. Consequently, we can see, not only, that the morality of the West differs from the Morality of the Middle East, but that they are incompatible. It is then concluded that all moral codes are not equal. How can you prosecute evil if all people are equal? By what authority? One must be chosen.
Race is not skin deep. Each, historically, stems from a particular culture and tradition. All things being objective, one culture is inherently superior to others. The Aztecs participated in infant sacrifices. Even if there are those who attempt to justify this behavior, God has time and time again condemned this ritual. Would anyone deny that what we have in the United States of America is not objectively superior to what was represented by the tribes of Central America a half millennium ago?
“It isn’t the American white man who is a racist, but it’s the American political, economic and social atmosphere that automatically nourishes a racist psychology in the white man.”
Malcom X
The anti-white, anti-American liberal is correct in that the USA was founded by White men. Our culture is rooted in White, Christian, Western traditions, and is therefore decidedly, in part, a “White Culture”. Where they are incorrect is that it was made, exclusively, for whites only. The Founding Fathers recognized that what they created was, inherently, superior to anything that existed anywhere else. If adopted by those of non-western descent, then there was the potential for a successful society of diverse peoples under a unified culture. That was the hope. The great experiment was ruined by the vindictive Left in their incessant demand that foreign cultures be maintained, independent, within the National borders. Indeed, if there was no significant difference or alteration from this decision, what would prompt the left and the hostile foreign cultures and religions to openly announce their intention of wiping out White, Western, and Christian culture. If there is no difference what, then, is their objective?
How to Identify
America is often endearingly referred to as The Melting Pot. But what is a Melting Pot? It functions to remove the qualities of each individual ingredient into something new. In other words, a loss of individual identity. Through social osmosis and the integration of foreign cultures into the country, the qualities that make America “America” would be diluted over time until it is no longer recognizable. Until it is no longer America. Through immigration, race loses its history. A Muslim from the Middle East could move to the United States and two generations down, their offspring would be completely westernized. These children would be strictly American, and any direct connection to their ancestry would be gone. Of course, the intention of these immigrants may differ. On one hand, you have refugees who are fleeing an oppressive government and families who are seeking a better life for themselves and their children. Why, then, a melting pot? This never made sense to me. If you settle in another country because it is better, it makes sense to adopt the culture that you were seeking, and many do, but to relocate and bring that which you ran from is counter intuitive. The only explanation is malevolence. A desire to destroy. The “great evil of the modern world”, Hitler himself, provided citizenship to third generational non-Aryans; to foreigners who had acclimated to German culture (Notes on the Third Reich, Evola). Through interracial marriage, over time, also, the global population will become more combined. As the differentially of race dissipates, so do their cultures, values, and morals. When all the cultures are put into a blender, you effectively, have no culture at all. The result is a “true for some, but not for others” worldview. Because when all cultures are present in one body of people, all cultures would have to be viewed as equal despite the fact that some cultures are averse to each other. Without a distinct worldview to base your beliefs, you have no reason for believing anything. This is the strength of Race, as it is defined, being a shared history, traditions, and values. When this is Race, as all things are, there is a hierarchy, and the hierarchy is objective. It must be.
“Love righteousness, ye that be judges of the earth.”
Wisdom of Solomon 1:1
It is critical that any approach must come from a place of simple understanding, and not resentment. Hierarchy is not equivalent to hatred, and it is easy to return the anger thrust upon those who speak out. This is not to advocate being a pushover and a passive observer. Doing so would be a betrayal of who you are and a reversal of everything I have promoted hitherto. The solution is to have a solid foundation. When analyzing differing worldviews, as the best man I know once said, “you need to know what to love, before you can know what to hate.” White supremacy can mean two things. On one hand it can be skin deep with a sense of superiority simply because of the color of one’s skin. This is dangerous and easy to do, and I urge you to avoid such a position. That said, the love of one’s culture as, historically, represented by skin color is admirable. The two are separate, but easily blurred. Christian, keep them apart. When accused of bigotry or racism, make no attempt to justify or defend. Laugh. What better method exists to dispel bitterness and bad blood? If they react with anger, as the majority undoubtedly will, then you know that they have no intention of hearing you out and are a lost cause. If, however, the response is of interest then you have the opportunity to win over an ally.
Leave a Reply