About

In a continuation of the reformed tradition, the mission of this site is to provide a platform for dissident Christians. In evangelical circles, only the regime-approved narrative is allowed to fill the gap between theoretical theology and how that gets applied. We believe these false narratives are wholly insufficient for a comprehensive Christian life.

You may notice that many of the articles have a distinctly Right-wing perspective. This is intentional. This site platforms those who need to speak out against the regime and Christians who refuse to merely repeat the politics of the age. If you are interested in submitting an article of your own, please fill out the contact form. Our publishing process is fairly informal, so if you are a Protestant with a pen, I’d love to hear from you.

If you have a query but are not interested in writing for Unconscionable, please use this form as well.


What is Unconscionable?

“Unreasonable; exceeding the limits of any reasonable claim or expectation; as an unconscionable request or demand…
Not guided or influenced by conscience.”

-Webster’s Dictionary, 1828

In essence, unconscionable defines what can be considered reasonable. If a contract were to make unreasonable or unethical demands, that contract would be regarded as void. Forcing a person to violate his conscience is one of the most horrific manipulations known to man. If a person cannot carry out his life with his conscience intact, what purpose does their life have? Everywhere, man lives his life by a moral code. The latest question is not whether or not a man has a conscience. The question asked by sociologists is, where does the conscience come from?

To most people before the last two centuries, it was evident that a man’s moral code was innate. Guided by natural law, right and wrong were often evident. The idea that man was born a “blank slate,” then given morals by society, is a post-modern idea, originating from John Locke around 1689. This was also around the time that sociology as a discipline was invented. Before the 18th century, there was no such thing as “social theory.” Thanks to a man called Jean-Jacques Rousseau, we now have to respond to the idea that man is just a product of society.

The Social Contract

Rousseau was a divisive character in history. He argued that society must shape itself to account for inequalities, which is done primarily through a social contract. Rousseau envisioned a democracy run by the people and that through this democracy, the imbalances would be rectified. As a sovereign government beholden to the majority, right was defined by what was suitable for the majority, and wrong was whatever was bad for the majority. Morality itself is defined and upheld by the government using the metaphorical social contract. Rousseau states, “The sovereign, merely by virtue of what it is, is always what it should be.” This line of reasoning entirely hinges on the idea that society is the sole influence of a man’s morals.

“It is sufficient for me to have proved that this is not the original state of man; and that it is the spirit of society alone, and the inequality it engenders, which thus change and alter all our natural inclinations.”

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Second Discourse – 1755

The implications of mankind’s “blank-slate morality” should be obvious. If morality is learned from society, society must be perfected. To the posthumanist, society must evolve and grow if mankind is ever to break free of evil. Society must progress towards utopia to rid the world of barbarism.

If you are a Christian, you know that this is not true. Morality does not originate from the values of a society. God is the definition of good, and evil is that which is contrary to him. Perfecting a social theory to “rid the world of evil” is nonsense to the Christian. Every man is “brought forth in iniquity” (Psalm 61:5). No amount of public training will rid him of this burden. And yet, Christians are constantly being called to heed the social contract.

The contract calls for men to bow to the needs of the many, yet Christians turn to a single God.

The contract says to respect perversions, yet Christians heed the wisdom of Scripture.

The contract says that the government must obey the will of the people, yet Christians say the government must answer to Christ the King.

Every day, you must choose between an unconscionable social contract or following Christ. Every day, you are told by humanists to give up religion and make yourself useful to society. Every day, you are told that REAL Christians would listen to societal demands for the sake of evangelism. Perhaps you are told that loving your neighbor means letting them rule your conscience. The choice for Christians is becoming increasingly evident, yet some still cannot see it. This site is intended to break society’s hold on the Christian lifestyle and replace it with a people seeking the kingdom of God. Every knee must bow to the name that is above all others.

Jesus Christ is Lord. (Phil. 2:9-11)